NBC of Canada 2015
Equivalent Static Force Procedure
Equivalent Static Force Procedure is implemented according to Section 4.1.8.11, Division B of NBC 2015. You are refereed to Sections 4.1.8.1 - 4.1.8.13 as well Commentary J of User's Guide - NBC 2015 -Structural Commentaries.
Seismic Base Shear
(4.1.8.11.2) |
The above equation is subjected to the following limits:
- For walls, coupled walls, and wall-frame systems, (for this equation, Mv must be calculated with T ≥ 4.0 sec according to the Table 4.1.8.11)
- For moment-resisting frames, braced frames, and other systems, (for this equation, Mv must be calculated with T ≥ 2.0 sec according to the Table 4.1.8.11)
- And if Rd ≥ 1.5, then
The limits given above are applied in the program.
The Fundamental Period (Ta)
- Clause d - i: For moment resisting frames:
- Clause d - ii: For braced frames:
- Clause d - iii: For shear wall structures:
- Clause d - iv: For other structures:
Spectral Response Acceleration (Sa)
It is the acceleration read from Design Spectral Acceleration Curve for the value of Ta.
Higher Mode Factor (Mv)
The higher mode factor, Mv, applied to base shear is read from Table 4.1.8.11, based on type of lateral resisting system, Ta and values of Sa(0.2) & Sa(2.0). It is also possible to enter Mv directly.
If engineer directly enters values for Mv, these values are used in base shear equation (4.1.8.11.2). On the other hand, a few supplemental equations still require values of Mv calculated at 2.0 sec. and 4.0 sec. (i.e., the equations impose limits on calculated value of base shear). In this case, the program still refers to the table to calculate Mv values at 2 and 4 seconds.
Force Modification Factors (Rd and Ro)
Ductility related force modification factor (Rd) is to account for capability of a structure to dissipate energy through inelastic behavior. Over-strength related force modification factor (Ro) is to account for the dependable portion of reserve strength in a structure. Values for both factors are defined in Table 4.1.8.9 for different types of structural systems. You must provide this value for each direction.
Design Spectral Acceleration Curve
(4.1.8.4-9) |
Distribution of Lateral Earthquake Force
(4.1.8.11-7) |
= |
Overturning Moments
The overturning moment calculation as given in 4.1.8.11.(8) is not implemented in the program.
Torsional Sensitivity
Torsional sensitivity ratio, Bx, as given in 4.1.8.11. (10) is neither calculated nor reported in the program.
Torsional Effects
Tx = Fx(ex ± 0.10Dnx) |
= | ||
= | ||
= |
It should be noted that the above equation is allowed to be used in the equivalent static force procedure if Bx ≤ 1.7. Otherwise, a dynamic analysis procedure is required. The program applies eccentric loading according to the equation without checking Bx. It is engineer’s responsibility to justify the applicability of the equation in the equivalent static force procedure.
The torsional effects related to natural eccentricity (i.e., ex) is implicitly included in the analysis (by definition, ex is associated with having center of mass and rigidity at different positions). To this end, the remaining eccentricity (i.e., ± 0.10 Dnx) is the only eccentricity calculated and applied in the equivalent static force procedure. Conveniently, this is exactly the same set of load applications required for the determination of the torsional sensitivity parameter, Bx. Even though Bx is not calculated or reported in the program, it is still possible to compute value of Bx from analysis results in which lateral loads are applied eccentricity according to the given equation.
Stability Factor (θx)
The stability factor as given in Commentary J, pg. J-26 is neither calculated nor reported.
Orthogonal Loading (4.1.8.8)
The program optionally creates additional load cases to account for 100/30% orthogonal loadings per 4.1.8.8. (c).
Direction of Loading
Response Spectra Analysis
Modal Response Spectrum Analysis according to 4.1.8.12 of Division B of NBC of Canada 2015 is implemented. Other methods (Numerical Integration Linear Time History Method and Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis) are not covered.
Design Spectral Acceleration
(4.1.8.4-9) |
For intermediate values, linear interpolation is used.
Accidental Torsional Eccentricity
- 4.1.8.12-4a: In this approach, which can be used for any value of B (torsional sensitivity) but is intended primarily for torsionally sensitive structures, the effects of static torsional moments, ( ± 0.10 Dnx ) Fx, at each level "x" are calculated and then combined with the effects determined from a dynamic analysis that includes the actual eccentricities (i.e., eccentricities due to mass center and center of rigidity of floors. In a 3D analysis, this is already covered).
- 4.1.8.12-4b: The second approach is only for permissible for structures that are not torsionally sensitive (B < 1.7). This approach allows the effects of accidental eccentricity to be included by shifting the center of mass by ± 0.05 Dnx.
Dynamic Base Shear
The elastic base shear (Ve) can be obtained from a modal response spectrum analysis (i.e., linear dynamic analysis). Sections 4.1.8.12.-6 and 4.1.8.12. -7 provides a method to obtain design base shear, Vd These sections are not implemented in the program.
Story Shears, Member Forces, and Deflections
Section 4.1.8.12.8 states that story shears, member forces and deflections obtained from response spectrum analysis shall be multiplied by . This section is not implemented. On the other hand, the following procedure is recommended: the program provides scale factors defined for the response spectra load case. The load case is run twice: the first run is with scale factors set to 1.0. This gives elastic base shear values (Ve). The second run includes the scale factors set to . The analysis results from the second run reflects the necessary modifications mentioned in 4.1.8.12.8.